Sermon Transcript:  January 29, 2012      -     The Fourth Sunday after the Epiphany     -     The Rev. R. Allan McCaslin
Readings: Deuteronomy 18:15-20;  Psalm 111;  I Corinthians 8:1-13;  Mark 1:21-28
 From Mark’s gospel,  “… a man with an unclean spirit … cried out, ‘What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us?” I speak to you in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen.

      Several years ago, I was invited to a rather posh dinner party in an exclusive Bostonneighborhood. But, for all the lavish surroundings and the alluring smells of what appeared to be top of the line hors d’oeuvres, something didn’t taste quite right. In fact, it was downright awful! I found myself wondering, “Where  did this come from?”  Of course, being polite, I said nothing to our host and then tried to eat around what was on my plate. Has this ever happened to you? 

      Such was the situation that St. Paul addresses in today’s reading from I Corinthians. Several church members feared that they might be eating meat that was already offered to idols. It was typical for pagan temples to sell off any leftover sacrificed meats after worship services. So, when you went to market, you had no idea if the meat on sale had actually been offered to a pagan god. Paul reminds the Church that we know and serve the only one, true God who, Paul says, is greater than any other god or lord in the heavens or on the earth. Therefore, Paul says (and I paraphrase here), “Who cares if some yahoo pagan priest waved a potroast over a pagan altar? Their god means nothing  to us. Whether we choose to eat or not to eat has no impact on our spiritual life: these meats are harmless. So, go for it and enjoy yourself.” But, then, Paul adds a word of caution. And these cautious words have divided the Church for centuries. Paul says, “But take care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak.” Paul explains that if any of our actions, anything we do or say, will encourage someone else to commit what they believe is a sin, then don’t do it. The hard part for us is that in this day, living in a multi-cultural society with different standards of conduct, especially among the myriad rules and regulations of Christian denominations right here in our own city that tell us you can’t do this or that, what we choose to eat and drink or choose to do or live is often interpreted as being unchristian. Case in point: Some churches insist that Christians don’t drink or smoke; nor do they gamble, play cards, go to movies, or dance. Some say that real Christian women never wear slacks and Christian men do not have long hair, and the list goes on. Sadly, this suggests that Christians should be outright divorced from our culture rather than engage it, never have any fun, nor enjoy the arts, or just relax with a cold beer on a hot summer day. 
 
      Paul would say these rules are poppycock! And yet, he reminds us that any  excess can be unhealthy for God’s people. And if what you are doing will cause someone else to stumble, then, think twice before you do it because we might harm someone else in addition to harming our own selves. Then, Paul goes a little further. This is what irritates me about Paul and what I like about him: he pushes the envelope just a little more; he ruffles our comfort zone. Paul says that if we do something that we know for ourselves is a sin, remember this: you never sin in private. Oh, we might think that how we live outside these walls is our own business and has no effect on the Church. But Paul says that even things done in secret damage the body of Christ. “Private sins” often influence how we look at an issue and can cause us to unduly and unfairly influence church mission. For example, if in our hearts we harbor racism, then we might work against issues of racial equality and try to deter the Church from taking a stand in the community. If, in our hearts, we really think the poor deserve their misfortune, we might work against offering them food or clothing, or ignore the beggar on the street and in so doing, ignore the Christ. 

 
 
Sermon: October 23, 2011, The 19th Sunday after Pentecost                                                The Rev. R. Allan McCaslin
Readings:
Deuteronomy 34:1-12; Psalm 90:1-6, 13-17; I Thessalonians 2:1-8; Matthew 22:34-46

      (From St. Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians),  “We are determined to share with you not only the gospel of God but also our own selves,” I speak to you in the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen.

      Our readings this morning offer a fascinating hodge-podge of messages. Our wonderful lesson from Deuteronomy speaks of the death of Moses. And like an epitaph, the writer laments, “never since has there arisen a prophet in Israel like Moses.” We hear in this reading the longing of the people of Israel for a new  prophet, a new  Moses who will deliver God’s people; a Messiah who will redeem them forever.  It is like that holy longing we hear throughout Advent, but it’s not Advent yet!  In the 10thchapter of Matthew’s gospel, Jesus is described as that new Moses; the new deliverer, not just of Israel, but of all creation. But, our Gospel reading this morning is not from chapter 10 at all. Instead, we hear from chapter 22 with another exchange between Jesus and the Pharisees on which commandment is the greatest and then a question about the meaning of the Messianic title, “Son of David.” Where’s the connection?

      Our reading from St. Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians includes a bit of a lament as Paul writes about how poorly he was treated by the Church at Philippi, but this lesson is really about the role of ministers and lay persons alike in caring for one another. Our Psalm, which forms the basis of that great hymn, “O God our help in ages past,” offers assurance of God’s presence and grace through every step of our lives. Each of these lessons is wonderful and each is encouraging on its own, and yet, we might wonder how they are connected.

     Today’s reading from Matthew begins with a reminder that Jesus silenced the Sadducees. The Sadducees were a group who upheld a literal understanding and interpretation of scripture. Like today’s Christian fundamentalists, any suggestion that there might be another way to apply the Bible to modern life, a fresh approach, a different understanding in light of contemporary moral issues, was treated as heresy and false teaching. The Sadducees were a powerful political bloc within Israel and they held a strict adherence to the Law of Moses exactly as it was written. But, in applying the letter of the law, they often missed the point or the intent of that law. In the verses leading up to today’s reading, Jesus basically showed the Sadducees that they didn’t know what they were talking about; that they certainly didn’t know the scriptures; and therefore, they should shut up. (And they did.) So,with this group silenced, the Pharisees stepped forward with a plan to trick Jesus. The Pharisees were a much more liberal group that allowed for interpretation of scripture to fit contemporary situations. But they took exception to Jesus’ claim to be able to forgive sins, to heal on the Sabbath and so on, because such authority belonged to God alone. They believed that Jesus was a misguided heretic who needed to be silenced because he was stirring things up and people were starting to question the authority of the religious and political establishment.
 
 
Sermon Transcript:      The Sixth Sunday after the Epiphany                 February 13, 2011                       The Rev. R. Allan McCaslin  Readings:    Deuteronomy 30:15-20;     Psalm 119:1-8; I     Corinthians 3:1-9;     Matthew 5:21-37

     From the Book of Deuteronomy, “Choose life so that you … may live, loving the Lord your God, obeying him, and holding fast to him; for that means life to you …” I speak in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen.

     Have you ever had one of those “Uh-oh” moments? That’s where you ignored that old adage, “Be careful what you ask for because you might get it” and found yourself in a pickle?

     Recently, I was commiserating with a fellow priest about our mutual dislike for the Revised Common Lectionary that determines which lessons of scripture are read aloud at Church. We noted that this new arrangement of scripture lessons rarely schedules the harsh sayings of Jesus for Sunday services. Difficult sayings of our Lord appear more often during weekdays when many are not present at Morning Prayer and, suffice to say, we never really gather to talk about those difficult texts. With smug disdain, I lamented that I longed for the days when Sunday readings forced us to grapple with difficult modern day issues. Then, this week, I had one of those “uh-oh” moments: not one, but all three of today’s scripture readings give us pause - serious pause.